New Commander in Chief To Take Over War On Terror

The future of American troops in Iraq and Afghanistan came up over and over in the race for the White House.

There is a great deal of interest in who will assume the role of decision maker for our armed forces and possibly answer the question of when we will see an end to the combat cycle.

As voters hit the American streets to cast their ballots, American soldiers toured the still dangerous roads of Baghdad.

For some, November 4th, Election Day is simply another day of duty. One soldier stated, “When I swore into the Army, I swore to defend the constitution of the United States no matter who is president. I got a job to do."

As Barack Obama accepted the presidential nomination, morning sun lit breakfast tables all across Iraq. It’s a new day with a new Commander in Chief.

As a repeated promise throughout his campaign, Obama’s first military priority is to end the war in Iraq.

Another soldier says, “Oh man, honestly. I hope there's a change. I mean this is my third rotation here. And I don't know if I could do a fourth man. Just away from family so much."

The situation is already showing signs of improvement. In response to a continued decrease in violence, the Pentagon will bring home 3,500 troops two months early, reducing the number of combat brigades to 14, the lowest since 2006.

Obama’s proposal has all combat brigades out by the end of 2010, and like the rest of the country which will soon have a new leader at the top, those in the U.S. military uniform are waiting to see what will happen next.

There is still a question of Afghanistan; reducing troops in Iraq would mean more could go to fight in Afghanistan. This is an ongoing challenge for the man stepping in as Commander in Chief.

You must be logged in to post comments.

Password (case sensitive):
Remember Me:

Read Comments

Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
  • by Cate on Nov 8, 2008 at 04:43 PM
    I can only hope and pray that Obama sticks to his word and ends this. I still just dont understand why they call it "the war on terrorism" because in reality, there are terrorists in every single country including our own, so does this mean we go to war with every country including ourselves? I mean what the hell are we winning in the end? Bush claims it isnt for oil, but come on, in reality there is no clear cut ruling on how the US will benefit in the end. We need to bring home our soldiers, give them better care, and taking all those billions of dollares used each month and put it towards securing our borders and surveilence with the help of the troops to the best that we possibly can.
KKTV 520 E. Colorado Colorado Springs, CO 80903 Office: (719) 634-2844 Fax: (719) 632-0808 News Fax: (719) 634-3741
Copyright © 2002-2016 - Designed by Gray Digital Media - Powered by Clickability 33955099 -
Gray Television, Inc.