Smoking Ban Leads To Decrease in Heart Attacks
Save Email Print
Updated: 10:35 AM Jan 2, 2009
Smoking Ban Leads To Decrease in Heart Attacks
The C.D.C. says they have studied neighboring areas to Pueblo without smoking bans and they haven't seen those same health benefits, which is another clear sign for researchers that the ban is responsible for the decrease in heart attacks.
Posted: 4:40 PM Jan 1, 2009
Reporter: Danielle Saar
Email Address: dsaar@kktv11news.com
Font Size:

The Centers for Disease Control released a study-- the longest of it's kind--showing that the number of heart attack cases dropped in the three years following the Pueblo's smoking ban.

Dr. Chris Nevin-Woods is one of the community researchers who put this study together.

Nevin-Woods says this may be a sign of just how serious a health risk secondhand smoke really is.

July 1st 2003 was when Pueblo said "no more" to smoking indoors.

"It was all public places, including buildings, restaurants, bowling alleys, bars," says Nevin-Woods.

The ordinance caused smokers to ban together and sign petitions, to reverse the smoking ban.

"Even though this ordinance was controversial in the beginning, it is very popular now, and it has had a significant effect on the health in Pueblo."

The biggest effect, Nevin-Woods says, heart attack rates in Pueblo have gone down more than 40 percent.

"We have literally saved hundreds of people from having heart attacks by having the community and community leaders pass this strict ordinance."

But critics of this study say its unclear if the smoking ban was the exact cause of Pueblo's heart attack decline.

Dr. Nevin-Woods says there are a number of factors that lead to the decrease in heart attack rates.

"More people quit smoking, people are definitely not exposed to secondhand smoke, people realize that this is dangerous and they stop smoking in homes and exposing their families and children to second hand smoke."

The C.D.C. says they have studied neighboring areas to Pueblo without smoking bans and they haven't seen those same health benefits, which is another clear sign for researchers that the ban is responsible for the decrease in heart attacks.


Latest Comments

Posted by: Geoff Tullett Location: Monroe WI on Jan 5, 2009 at 04:29 PM

While this "smoke free miracle" has been going on I wonder how many stents the local cardiologists have inserted? I would think the answer might lie here.
[ Report Abuse ]
Posted by: don Location: co spgs on Jan 2, 2009 at 02:23 PM

you know everyone, THIS IS A JOKE! LMAO
[ Report Abuse ]
Posted by: NATIVE Location: COLORADO SPRINGS on Jan 2, 2009 at 11:44 AM

GOOD!!! PEOPLE MAKE POOR CHOICES ABOUT THEIR HEALTH....TOBACCO IS A BAD HABIT-A RUDE HABIT AT THAT, IT IS A KILLER OF THOSE WHO PARTAKE AND UNFORTUNATELY IT AFFECTS THOSE WHO ARE AROUND THOSE WHO PARTAKE.
[ Report Abuse ]
National News - CBSnews.com
KKTV Online Poll
Do you agree with the new breast cancer study, recommending no mammograms before age 50 and no self-examinations?

Yes, it's unnecessary for most before age 50
No, I think it is better to be safe than sorry


To read more about the study, Click Here.
KKTV on Twitter