Some Bar Owners Defying State Law;Allowing Patrons To Smoke Indoors
Save Email Print
Updated: 11:45 PM Mar 22, 2008
Some Bar Owners Defying State Law;Allowing Patrons To Smoke Indoors
Colorado Springs
Several bar owners around Colorado Springs refuse to go smoke free despite the state-wide smoking ban that's been in effect for nearly two years.
Posted: 5:38 PM Mar 22, 2008
Reporter: Rosie Barresi
Email Address: rbarresi@kktv11news.com
Font Size:

Several bar owners around Colorado Springs refuse to go smoke free despite the state-wide smoking ban that's been in effect for nearly two years.

The owner of Murray Street Darts, Bruce Hicks says, he's not stopping his customers from lighting up. He does however ask that they donate $1 if they do decided to smoke inside his bar.

Hicks says he's using the money to pay smoking tickets and lawyers.

"Tobacco is a legal substance and the government is taking away my rights," said Hicks.

Hicks is challenging the state-wide smoking ban law that was passed in July of 2006.

Hicks has been going to court to battle his smoking tickets and he believes he's winning. "I've gotten 23 tickets and 19 of them have been dismissed so far," said Hicks.

He's also been going to court to have the current smoking ban law declared unconstitutional. "We are going to stir enough up that the legislators will have to re-write the law," said Hicks. Then he said, he wants the law amended to exempt small bars.

Other bar owners around town say Hicks is running his risks. "We did not want to put our liquor license on the line," said Neil Hager, owner of Dead Ant Tavern.

Hager says he doesn't like the smoking ban either. "I think it's a very poor law," said Hager. But he says he will continue to obey the law and will continue to hang a sign of defiance outside his business. The sign reads: Smoking, my business, my customers, our choice!

Hicks has already paid thousands of dollars in legal fees and nearly $1,000 in smoking tickets. He says every penny has been worth it. His next court date is in June.


Latest Comments

Posted by: Ratt Location: C/S on Mar 27, 2008 at 12:55 PM

Shelley must be a smoker as well.
[ Report Abuse ]
Posted by: Shelley Location: Colorado Springs CO on Mar 27, 2008 at 09:29 AM

There are plenty of things I personally don't like but that doesn't mean there should be a law against them. I don't like sitting in rush-hour traffic twice a day "inhaling" all of the exhaust fumes. That CAN'T be good for you but is there a law against it? What's the difference between exhaust fumes and second-hand smoke? And if vehicle exhaust were found to be more dangerous than even the "big bad second-hand cigarette smoke," will they ban driving all-together? There are many laws on the books that do not make sense and this is clearly one of them.
[ Report Abuse ]
Posted by: Dan Location: C/S on Mar 27, 2008 at 06:50 AM

You're correct, cigarette smokers do have rights. They have the right to keep that nasty disgusting habit at home. I have many friends that smoke and not a one of the whines, like many in here, about having to go outside to burn one. Ami, you have hostility issues. There are professionals who can help you.
[ Report Abuse ]
National News - CBSnews.com
KKTV Online Poll
Do you agree with the new breast cancer study, recommending no mammograms before age 50 and no self-examinations?

Yes, it's unnecessary for most before age 50
No, I think it is better to be safe than sorry


To read more about the study, Click Here.
KKTV on Twitter