KKTV Online Poll
Do you have a long-term health insurance plan?

Yes, I've done my research.
Yes, but I'm worried about my plan.
No, it's something I keep meaning to do.


Watch Betty Sexton's in-depth report, Health and Wealth; Protecting Your Life Savings by clicking HERE .
Some Bar Owners Defying State Law;Allowing Patrons To Smoke Indoors Save Email Print
Colorado Springs
Posted: 5:38 PM Mar 22, 2008
Last Updated: 11:45 PM Mar 22, 2008
Reporter: Rosie Barresi
Email Address: rbarresi@kktv11news.com

A | A | A

Several bar owners around Colorado Springs refuse to go smoke free despite the state-wide smoking ban that's been in effect for nearly two years.

The owner of Murray Street Darts, Bruce Hicks says, he's not stopping his customers from lighting up. He does however ask that they donate $1 if they do decided to smoke inside his bar.

Hicks says he's using the money to pay smoking tickets and lawyers.

"Tobacco is a legal substance and the government is taking away my rights," said Hicks.

Hicks is challenging the state-wide smoking ban law that was passed in July of 2006.

Hicks has been going to court to battle his smoking tickets and he believes he's winning. "I've gotten 23 tickets and 19 of them have been dismissed so far," said Hicks.

He's also been going to court to have the current smoking ban law declared unconstitutional. "We are going to stir enough up that the legislators will have to re-write the law," said Hicks. Then he said, he wants the law amended to exempt small bars.

Other bar owners around town say Hicks is running his risks. "We did not want to put our liquor license on the line," said Neil Hager, owner of Dead Ant Tavern.

Hager says he doesn't like the smoking ban either. "I think it's a very poor law," said Hager. But he says he will continue to obey the law and will continue to hang a sign of defiance outside his business. The sign reads: Smoking, my business, my customers, our choice!

Hicks has already paid thousands of dollars in legal fees and nearly $1,000 in smoking tickets. He says every penny has been worth it. His next court date is in June.

Email  del.icio.us   Google   Yahoo  digg
More Stories
Washington Man Arrested in Fremont County

New Information On Kidnapping In Southwest Colorado Springs

Fremont County Wildfire

NORAD Celebrates 50th Anniversary

CSU Plans $300 Million In Construction In Next 24 Months

Christian Ministry To Distribute Bibles With Newspapers

Cimarron Bridge Concrete Tests Fail

Stamp Price Increases

Post Your Comments
First Name:
Location:
Enter Comments: characters left
Email (optional):
Email will not be displayed on site. For station contact purpose only.
Read Comments
Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
Posted by: Ratt Location: C/S on Mar 27, 2008 at 12:55 PM
Shelley must be a smoker as well.

Posted by: Shelley Location: Colorado Springs CO on Mar 27, 2008 at 09:29 AM
There are plenty of things I personally don't like but that doesn't mean there should be a law against them. I don't like sitting in rush-hour traffic twice a day "inhaling" all of the exhaust fumes. That CAN'T be good for you but is there a law against it? What's the difference between exhaust fumes and second-hand smoke? And if vehicle exhaust were found to be more dangerous than even the "big bad second-hand cigarette smoke," will they ban driving all-together? There are many laws on the books that do not make sense and this is clearly one of them.

Posted by: Dan Location: C/S on Mar 27, 2008 at 06:50 AM
You're correct, cigarette smokers do have rights. They have the right to keep that nasty disgusting habit at home. I have many friends that smoke and not a one of the whines, like many in here, about having to go outside to burn one. Ami, you have hostility issues. There are professionals who can help you.

Posted by: Dave Location: Colorado Springs on Mar 26, 2008 at 11:58 AM
Let's make things easy. Have the owner post a sign stating that smoking is allowed in their establishment and if someone does not want to be there or work, go to another bar or find a different job. What is the problem with that. Everyone has a choice that way. Oh yeah, the government would not be in control.

Posted by: Marsha Allen Location: Colorado Springs on Mar 26, 2008 at 02:20 AM
A true American making a stand against the unwelcome, unconstitutional dictatorship in the dubious name of 'health'. Too bad those who believe like wise haven't formed a united front with Hicks. Smokers have rights too.

Posted by: ami Location: idaho on Mar 25, 2008 at 09:02 PM
I have lived my whole life in Colorado Springs and I have the right to say my two cents!!!!

Posted by: Hal Location: CO on Mar 24, 2008 at 05:21 PM
Enough of these **** yuppies running this country...so sick of these people complaining about this and about that...who's right and who's wrong and your going to kill me with you second hand smoke cause you should not smoke to begin with. And your wrong and I am right that is all there is to it. I hate the smoke; can't stand the way it smells and the way it clings to my clothes but I know if I go somewhere (a bar) that some people choose to smoke and chances are I will probably end up smelling like that at the end of the night. It just comes with the territory...I hate it and can't stand it but it is not up to me to tell the business owner he needs to revamp his model and process to accomodate me. **** on the yuppies they are taking over this city and country. Ban the yuppies from entering the bar's.

Posted by: Jamil Location: C Springs on Mar 24, 2008 at 10:04 AM
This law is not about smokers (or nonsmokers) rights. It is about the rights of business owners. A bar owner should have the right to allow smoking or not. There were several restaurants that were nonsmoking before the ban, and no one complained. It is the owners decision. If you don't like smoke, don't go to a place that allows it. If you want to smoke, don't go to a place that doesn't allow it. It's really not that complicated. Majority rules is not a good way to rule society. If it was, we would still have slavery.

Posted by: Robert Location: C on Mar 24, 2008 at 07:55 AM
I agree the law should be amended to exempt "small neighborhood bars". I applaud Mr. Hicks for standing up for his business. I wish you the best.

Posted by: Andy Location: C/S on Mar 24, 2008 at 06:55 AM
Why are people from OUTSIDE of Colorado adding their two cents? Who in the **** names their kid DaJuan?

Posted by: lucie aldridge Location: colorodo springs, co on Mar 24, 2008 at 06:45 AM
i am behind every bar owner that is fighting this no smoking law. what about the smokers rights? ya never hear anything about protecting our rights! it's not fair. we have the right to smoke just as much as the person that doesn't smoke not to be around smoke. by golly it's a bar! i think our government sticks their nose in places where it really doesn't belong. seems they could find better things to stick their nose in. like people who run yellow lights, and are to rud to move over to let traffic out of ramps. we smokers pay our taxes just as much as the non smoker if not more taxes. we are paying for the right to smoke(yes in more ways than one) but that's our right too, isn't it?

Posted by: Christian Location: 5 Points on Mar 24, 2008 at 01:08 AM
I don't smoke, but who the hell am I to tell you what you can do in your own business. If you don't like the smoke filled bar then go to a smoke free bar, simple as that. I'm sick and tired of these pansies complaining. It's like a radio station. Don't like what you hear then switch the frequency. Whats next? You can't drink liquor in the bars because you might drive drunk and kill someone? How about we stop driving all together since tens of thousands die every year on our roads. Better yet, ban salt at all restaurants because it kills thousands every year just like second hand smoke.

Posted by: rob Location: colorado springs on Mar 23, 2008 at 03:24 PM
Since when do we have the right to blow second hand smoke in a closed environment? I think most people have this wrong...we don't! and i am a smoker. There is absolutely nothing wrong with smoke free bars; we as smokers act like it's our right to smoke where ever we want. How is it that non-smokers don't have any rights? How is it that ONLY smokers go to bars? Again i'm a smoker.

Posted by: David Location: Colorado Springs on Mar 23, 2008 at 11:27 AM
I no longer smoke (I used to) and although I like the smoke-free environment in bars these days I disagree with the law. I think it should be the bar owner's decision as to whether an establishment is smoke free. But in a democratic society the majority rules and the laws aren't always what every individual wants. So I also believe people should abide by the law and work towards changing it if they believe it's wrong.

Posted by: DaJuan Hayes Location: Rockville, MD on Mar 23, 2008 at 07:52 AM
Thank goodness there are still a few people in this world who refuse to knuckle under to the government like sheep, who still understand the concept of civil disobedience. As long as tobacco is legal to purchase and consume by adults, people should be free to enjoy it in adult environments like bars. Besides, people don't go to bars to be HEALTHY; they go to bars to drink, to relax, and to have FUN. They don't go to bars expecting the Health Police to be looking over their shoulders all the time. If I want to go someplace to be HEALTHY, I'll go to yoga studio, thank you very much.

Posted by: rob Location: colorado springs on Mar 23, 2008 at 06:22 AM
I've been a smoker for 18 years; and i will be the first to say, "I love the smoking ban!" It's really not that big a deal to go outside for a smoke; even as a smoker, I hated going to bars and everyone is lighting up. Get over the ban people. True it is a right to smoke; however, it is non-smokers rights not to have smoke when they are out having a good time.

Posted by: Audrey Silk Location: Brooklyn, NY on Mar 23, 2008 at 01:26 AM
Mr. Hager gets no pat on the back for his empty act. Hanging a sign of defiance while obeying the law? Do you think that scores you any points Mr. Hager? Rather, Mr. Hicks is putting his money where his mouth is. It amounts to real protest, not the phony objection that amounts to no more than a ploy to stroke smoking customers' minds. If they had any brains they'd laugh and stop patronizing a place that insults their intelligence just to retain their business (read dollars). Mr. Hager the wimp has no business making any comments about Mr. Hicks the brave. Audrey Silk Founder, NYC Citizens Lobbying Against Smoker Harassment (C.L.A.S.H.)

Posted by: Pete Location: Denver on Mar 22, 2008 at 08:51 PM
It looks like the state needs to take stronger measures against some of these repeat offenders. Maybe if their liquor licences get suspended for a few weeks or more they'll think twice before encouraging smokers to break the law. They've had more than enough time to comply with the law.

Posted by: Roger Location: C/S on Mar 22, 2008 at 07:05 PM
I say take their liquor licenses for the act of defiance.

Posted by: ED Location: C/S on Mar 22, 2008 at 05:47 PM
I no longer smoke, but want to say thanks Mr. Hicks for taking a stand. We need more people around with some guts.

National News - CBSnews.com
  • 30,000 Buried In China Quake Debris
    With about 12,000 people already confirmed dead, China's state media now says that almost another 29,000 are still thought to be buried under rubble in two cities near the epicenter of a massive earthquake.
  • Bush Admin. "Silent" On Iraq Corruption
    Two former State Department employees say the Bush administration repeatedly ignored high-level corruption in the Iraqi government and kept secret potentially embarrassing information so as not to undermine its relationship with Baghdad.
  • Florida Wildfires Scar More Than 50 Homes
    Dry, windy weather has fueled several wildfires on Florida's central Atlantic coast, damaging more than 50 homes and driving hundreds of residents away as the governor declared a state of emergency.