Health Care Law In The Hands Of Supreme Court


The fate of President Obama's signature achievement, the Affordable Care Act (ACA), is in the hands of the nine Supreme Court justices.

People began lining up Friday for their chance to be in be inside the courtroom for the opportunity to see history unfold.

Justices are expected to kick off arguments Monday by questioning whether it is too soon to even be hearing the case, as the key part of the law actually under fire--the individual mandate, which requires all Americans purchase insurance or pay a fine--does not take effect until 2014. A lower court previously ruled that the lawsuits filed by 26 states should wait until then.

Justices will continue to hear arguments throughout the week even if they do determine the lower court was correct.

The Supreme Court is in particular focusing on two important questions: does Congress have the power to force people to buy something; and if the answer is no, and the individual mandate is struck down, does it unravel the entire health care law?

Lower courts have had mixed rulings on the individual mandate, with some ruling in favor of the mandate and others striking it down. One lower court rejected the mandate, but ruled that the rest of the law could stand.

The administration says the requirement that all citizens who can afford insurance purchase it is needed in order to implement a critical component of the ACA: that insurers cannot drop people with pre-existing conditions or raise premiums based on medical history.

The reasoning is that uninsured raise health care costs on everybody else, since they typically only seek care in emergencies. If they can't pay the cost of the treatment they receive, hospitals absorb the costs, then raise the costs of their services on those who are insured. This leads insurance companies to raise their premiums to cover their higher health care costs.

If compelled to do so, as they would be if the individual mandate stands, healthy individuals who might otherwise opt to remain uninsured would purchase insurance, allowing insurance companies to keep premiums low for everyone.

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services say Americans making very low income who cannot afford insurance or those whose religious beliefs conflict with the mandate would not have to comply.

Opponents of the mandate say that if the law stands, Congress would be granted greater authority to dictate what Americans do with their lives.

Colorado Attorney General John Suthers likened the mandate to giving the government the authority to force citizens to buy energy-saving cars.

Legal experts have called the case the most critical since FDR's New Deal program went under review decades ago.

A ruling is expected in June.

You must be logged in to post comments.

Password (case sensitive):
Remember Me:

Read Comments

Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
  • by Arctic Warrior Location: CO Springs on Mar 26, 2012 at 08:03 AM
    Let's hope they have the right moral integrity when they vote!
  • by CR Location: cs on Mar 26, 2012 at 07:41 AM
    The 14,000, THOUSAND, new IRS Agents to collect the penalty of not falling for this 'healthcare' is what's scary. Read the Drudge headline of O's quote to the Ruskies..'After I'm elected, I can be more 'flexible' (on defense system for you)'. Be afraid, be very afraid.. ABO in November
  • by Nath Location: Colo Spgs on Mar 26, 2012 at 06:31 AM
    I still haven't seen anywhere if "justice" Kagan is reclusing herself from this case. It will be a critical conflict of interests if she doesn't since she crafted and directed the defense of ObamaCare in the lower court cases, before being appointed to the SCOTUS.
  • by Phil Location: Left of Center on Mar 26, 2012 at 06:13 AM
    Repeal Social Security! ..Repeal FICA! ..Repeal all taxes for schools!..Repeal all taxes! ..Why should a healthy individual that is already educated and whos' children have graduated have to pay for others? ..simple answer ..eminent domain ..for the betterment of all quit crying foul you cheap Repuke traitors and pony up
    • reply
      by Poor Phil... on Mar 26, 2012 at 07:27 AM in reply to Phil
      drunk again.
    • reply
      by easterner on Mar 27, 2012 at 09:01 AM in reply to Phil
      Phil. . .a man who feels he owes a debt to society and wants to pay it with other people's money.
    • reply
      by LedHed on Mar 28, 2012 at 08:57 AM in reply to Phil
      It's a little early for Boone's Farm, Phil.
KKTV 520 E. Colorado Colorado Springs, CO 80903 Office: (719) 634-2844 Fax: (719) 632-0808 News Fax: (719) 634-3741
Copyright © 2002-2016 - Designed by Gray Digital Media - Powered by Clickability 144202315 -
Gray Television, Inc.