|
Updated: 8:00 PM Mar 10, 2010
Red Light Cameras Cost City, Not Bringing In Big Bucks
A program some critics call wasteful may not be working out as expected in one southern Colorado city.
Posted: 6:55 PM Mar 10, 2010Reporter: Jason Aubry Email Address: Jaubry@kktv.com |
|
Red light cameras are controversial, and many believe they are a significant source of income for cities which use them. But, in Pueblo, a program some critics call wasteful may not be working out as expected in one southern Colorado city.
Up until six months ago, accidents caused by drivers who ran the red light outside the Pueblo PC and Mac computer store, on the corner of Prairie and Thatcher, used to be a frequent occurrence. "It was scary to hear a crunch, and then you're running, and grabbing the phone, or trying to call and see what happened," recalls the store's owner Muriel Tincher.
That all changed though, when the city installed red light cameras at the intersection. Since then, there have only been two accidents at the intersection.
Evem though there seems to be a safety improvement, the city is now facing a financial problem with this system. Some people are not paying their photo tickets. "Based on the number of tickets, we're only getting payment on about 80 percent of [them]," says Pueblo City Manager Jerry Pacheco.
This has left the city $20 thousand in the red, which has some people criticizing it on a financial level. Originally the city council bought into the program because the money brought in by the cameras was projected to cover the cost to rent them. Pueblo pays $15 thousand every month to rent three camera systems from American Traffic Solutions (ATS). The cameras cover two intersections in the city. That's $90 thousand dollars to date in rental fees. Currently, the city has only collected about $70 thousand from tickets.
Pacheco says, part of the problem is not every red light photo can be used to issue a ticket; something the city was banking on. It's been discovered that during winter months, snow sometimes covers the markings on the pavement that police use to decide if someone has indeed run the red light. Another winter related issue is snow obscuring the license plate number making it impossible for authorities to positively identify the vehicle running the red light.
Compared to the lower than expected number of tickets issued, the problem of people not paying their ticket is a greater one. Pacheco says, police are taking this very seriously, and talks are already underway to ramp up contacting delinquent drivers in order to bring in the money owed.
This could go as far as the court issuing a summons for the driver to go before a judge. If the driver ignores the summons, a warrant for their arrest can be issued.
Meanwhile, Tincher says she does not care that the city is losing money on the project, "In ways of making this corner safer, to me it's worth it."
However, Pacheco says, he has his own concerns about the cost to taxpayers and the future of the program, "I would certainly want to make sure that, that issue was dealt with before I ever propose to city council expanding the program."
According to Pacheco, one likely way the city could deal with the issue is to work with ATS to adjust how much it is paying to rent the systems.
Latest Comments
The only reason wrecks have decreased is because, people are using alternate routes and avoiding the cameras. I see people working on the cameras on Norwood at least twice a month. Something that needs that much maintenance makes me believe their not even working properly. Especially when i have witnessed them flash on green and not on red when people still continue to run them. IMO Pueblo would have MADE money if they has put them on Bonforte/Hudson/Hwy50 bypass to begin with. There are just as many wrecks/speeders/red light runners if not more there, than on Norwood. A loss like this a long with other poor decisions, makes Pueblo as a whole look dumb/wasteful!
I believe "cost-neutral" contracts for red light cameras may be ILLEGAL in Colorado. Colorado statute CRS 42-4-110.5 (Automated vehicle identification system) states: “The compensation paid by the state, county, city and county, or municipality for such equipment shall be based upon the value of such equipment and may not be based upon the number of traffic citations issued or the revenue generated by such equipment.” Based on the above statute, I don’t see how American Traffic Solutions picking up the Pueblo’s $20,000 debt can be legal?
RLC were never put up for safety. Only revenue. The safety argument is just a selling point. RLC require long term violations to be profitable the only was to do this is to either game the light (short yellows, hair trigger grace periods) or get ultra strict with non dangerous right turns on red and stopping 1 foot over the stop line. It is the fundimental problem of photo enforcment. THEY NEED REVENUE TO SURVIVE! http://www.banthecams.org/2010030248/RLC-Vendors-NEED-to-CHURN-TICKETS-TO-SURVIVE.html
![]() |
KKTV and our Partners are proud to make Moms life easier…click here for more information |
![]() |
Click here for more information from our local health care specialists. |
![]() |
Do you have a story idea? Want to report breaking news? Call our newsroom at (719) 578-0000 or e-mail News@kktv.com. |
![]() |
Click Here to have KKTV come to your school! |
![]() |
Watch full episodes of your favorite CBS shows right here on KKTV.com. |
| Latest Blogs |
|









